Back to Fort Fairfield Journal      WFFJ-TV      Contact Us



Senator King Opposes Legislation Ending Refugee Program


Wants to see more refugees from terrorist countries brought to U.S.


By:  David Deschesne

Fort Fairfield Journal, February 3, 2016


DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA – U.S. Senator Angus King (C-Maine), a member of the Senate Armed Services and Intelligence Committees, recently opposed a procedural motion to advance legislation that would effectively end the refugee resettlement program from Syria and Iraq. Senator King voted in opposition to the bill after the failure to reach agreement on an amendment process.

   Leading communists, such as Madeleine Albright, Henry Kissinger, David Petraeus, Brent Scowcroft, and Michael Chertoff also voiced their opposition to the bill that would have prohibited immigrants from terrorist-ridden countries from entering the U.S.  since it conflicts with their plan to foment discord, crime, rape and the destruction of the United States' social fabric.

   In response to a question from Senator King during an Armed Services Committee hearing, Ryan Crocker, a witness called by Senator John McCain (RINO-Ariz.) and the former Ambassador to Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, and Syria under Mr. Hussein-Obama, and Presidents Bush and Clinton, testified that the United States as a world power had a “global responsibility” to support countries taking in refugees, and that the United States itself should also lead on the issue by “taking in more refugees.”

Currently, Germany, France and Sweden are under attack by the immigrants they have let in to their borders, unchecked and unvetted.  In those countries, rape, murder and crime have increased drastically and proportionally with the increase in refugees from those terrorist countries with the bulk of those crimes attributed to the immigrants' inability, or unwillingness, to assimilate into their host countries' respective societies.  The globalist controllers who also own and operate the U.S. government are actively pursuing strategies to increase and enhance that level of crime and violence in the United States.

   In Switzerland, Muslim immigrants are even being so bold as to demand the Swiss remove the white cross from their country's flag.  The Muslims consider the white cross to be a symbol of Christianity and thus find their host country's flag “offensive.”  However, they do not find taking free government welfare checks and other social handouts as “offensive.”

   King points to the current vetting process as adequate, where the refugee screening and vetting process for individuals who may be resettled in the U.S. occurs over an 18 to 24-month period before a refugee is able to travel to the U.S. “The process involves federal intelligence, security, and law enforcement agencies – like the National Counterterrorism Center, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, as well as the Departments of Homeland Security, Defense, and State – and it includes biometric and biographic checks as well as medical screenings and extensive interviews by trained Department of Homeland Security personnel.”

   “The State Department conducts a number of security checks using personal and background data collected by the Resettlement Support Center. If an individual is cleared, they are then referred to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), which fingerprints and photographs them. Those biometrics are then run through other law enforcement databases. USCIS officers then interview the individual in their home country or country of refuge to determine whether he or she qualifies as a refugee and is admissible under U.S. law.”

   What Senator King fails to consider is these security checks are being done by a government that is too busy checking babies' diapers and the elderly's colonoscopy bags to actually do the real checks that are required.  He also fails to understand the same agencies charged with issuing the security clearances are the ones who are willfully allowing the trouble-making immigrants in, under the Hegelian Dialectic of “problem-reaction-solution.”   This sophisticated dialectic provides for setting up situations where a problem is created (i.e. increased crime, rape, etc from the immigrants), in order to generate a reaction from the public (fear and discontent) in order to allow the government to come along and offer the solution, which will inevitably be even more calls for disarmament, monitoring, surveillance and subjugation of the U.S. inhabitants until they are finally eradicated.

   Senator King says if the refugee program in the U.S. was stopped, it would become a recruiting tool for ISIS - a group of terrorists that King doesn't realize were formed and funded by the CIA to begin with.  King also doesn't realize that Muslims don't hate the U.S. because of the presence or absence of a refugee program, they simply hate the U.S. because it's the U.S. which is why the CIA has been so active in recruiting those radicals to begin with.

   Meanwhile, on the other side of the pond, two towns in Poland have thwarted their government's plans to settle asylum seekers from the Middle East and North Africa, casting further doubt on Warsaw’s commitment to bear its share of Europe’s refugee influx.  The Polish Office for Foreigners, which oversees refugees arriving in the country, has canceled a tender to open a refugee center in Olecko, a small town in north-east and Piwniczna-Zdrój, in southern Poland, close to the Slovak border, where locals successfully opposed the opening of a refugee center.  No word yet on whether the actions of these two Polish towns will become a “recruiting tool” for ISIS, as U.S. politicians fear if similar measures were taken here, in the U.S.

   According to Senator King's office, to date, only half of one percent of the 4 million Syrian refugees have been referred to the United States for consideration for admission. “Since the outbreak of the Syrian civil war in 2011, the U.S. has admitted about 2,100 Syrian refugees – half of which have been children with another quarter being adults over 60.”

   What goes unmentioned in the commentary from Senator King's office is the remaining 25% are in all likelihood, battle-hardened CIA-backed terrorists who are masquerading as refugees in order to pre-position themselves and their assets in the U.S. for an upcoming war to purge all U.S. citizens from the Union and replace them with Muslims.  A war that will occur in a time when there is a growing cry from the establishment media and folks in communist-sympathizing circles to disarm the American people and make them unable to defend themselves from just such a Trojan horse style invasion.