Fort Fairfield Journal About Us Contact Us Advertising Rates Subscribe Distribution Bible Reference Our Library
From the Editor
By: David Deschesne
Editor/Publisher, Fort Fairfield Journal
North Korean Nuclear Threat. Really?
Kim Jong Un , the current leader of communist North Korea had no military experience whatsoever before his daddy, the former leader, made him a four-star general. This young punk had never accomplished anything in his life that would even come close to military leadership. He hadn't even so much as led a Cub Scout troop, coached a sports team, or commanded a military platoon.So he is made the “Beloved Leader” Of North Korea.
Now before you poke too much fun at those backward morons in charge of North Korea, remember that we did the same thing here in the U.S.
We took an arrogant communistorganizer, who had never worn a uniform, and made him Commander-in-Chief. A guy, who had never had a real job, worked on a budget, or led anything more than an ACORN demonstration, and we made him “Beloved Leader” of the United States ......TWICE !
I preface this editorial with that reminder as I discuss the current nuclear threats from North Korean communist dictator Kim Jong Un.
I am not worried about a backward military from a country the size of New York state that can’t even feed itself and rules by such brute force that the only way it can convince its citizens to stay is by erecting barriers and guarding them to keep them in—such is a hallmark of all communist dictatorships.
Despite the efforts of Hollywood in their remake of the movie Red Dawn, few of us really believe North Korea could ever do anything other than verbally antagonize the U.S.
Let me digress with a little history of the movie, Red Dawn. For those of you too young to remember the first one, it was produced in the 1980’s during the waning years of the Cold War with the Soviet Union. The premise of the movie was the communists from the Soviet Union came in and took over the United States, leaving bands of rag-tag rebel citizens to defend their hometowns and try to thwart the efforts of the invaders (in the movie, the Soviets used our hunting license records to determine who was likely armed and targeted them first for eradication or reeducation, that’s why gun registration is such a bad idea).
At the time, that was a realistic movie because the Soviet Union did have those capabilities. When the remake was done, the producers used communist China as the aggressor nation, which was also realistic. However, the movie was criticized by Chinese distributors who didn’t want China being cast in such a negative light because it would affect ticket sales at Chinese movie theaters. So, the producers went back in post-production and digitally changed all the Chinese emblems and flags to North Korea and edited all the dialogue to fit. The result was a movie that nobody who knows history or current events will believe and it suffered dismally in the box office (released in November, 2012, as of February 15, 2013 it had grossed $44.8 million but had an estimated $65 million budget).
Another attempt at demonizing North Korea can be found in the video game, Homefront, whose developers decided to swap out the Chinese invaders for North Korean.
Now, I said all that to say this: I’m not worried about the young punk on the other side of the Pacific with virtually no military and no worldwide capabilities short of being able to haphazardly launch an intercontinental ballistic missile (courtesy of his communist Chinese confederates) with little to no accuracy. Instead, what we should all be concerned with is the young punk on this side of the Pacific who infests the White House today. Barack Hussein-Obama is an American-hating communist bent on destroying the business, banking, social and moral systems that once made the U.S. great. While he is incredibly dangerous because so many gullible people think he means well, the greater danger is those people in the banking and military industrial complex who tell him what to do from one minute to the next. Those people play for keeps and false-flag operations are what they specialize in.
So, what’s a false flag? A false flag operation is when the government stages or allows a military style hit (or school gunmen, etc) on itself or some of its own cities in order to generate fear from its citizenry and direct the wrath and anger onto its political enemies for profit and gain.
In the late 1800’s the U.S.S. Maine was sunk in Havana Harbor, Cuba as a result of a coal boiler explosion. The U.S. government used that event as a pretext to enter into the Spanish/American War. During World War I, the Lusitania was sunk by German U-Boats because, while carrying civilian passengers, it was also covertly carrying war supplies destined for Europe, which made it a military target. Germany attempted to warn the American passengers that they may not be safe on that ship, but the ads were scrubbed from the newspapers by the J.P. Morgan-run U.S. government. The U.S. then used that sinking as a pretext to enter World War I in order to prop up Morgan’s European war bonds. During World War II, the feds allowed the Japanese to bomb Pearl Harbor (I won’t bore you with the proof, suffice to say the feds knew the attack was coming well in advance) to get us into World War II.
During the 1960’s the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) hatched a plan to fly anti-communist pilots over Cuba with planes marked as Cuban air force in order to make the Cuban military think there had been a military coup. What followed was the failed Bay of Pigs invasion that pinned down those CIA-backed anti-communist troops that had landed on the shore of the Bay of Pigs with the U.S. Navy’s assistance.
Around that same time, the Defense Department had drafted a plan called Operation Northwoods that highlighted plans to stage attacks in and on the United States in order to blame it on our enemies. That means the military was willing to kill American citizens in order to advance their goals of profiteering and world domination for the banks who now own and operate them. President John F. Kennedy quashed that plan and was assassinated shortly thereafter.
In the 1990’s the feds allowed Iraqi leader, Sadam Hussein to attack Kuwait, who was slant-drilling into Iraq’s oil. The feds then used that event to launch Gulf War I. They then instituted a nearly 20 year propaganda campaign against the Iraqi leader, who was trained by our CIA and installed by our government as leader of Iraq, to make him out as some evil dictator because he was attempting to denominate his oil sales in currency other than U.S. dollars against the wishes of the private corporation known as the “Federal Reserve.” We all know the end of that story.
In 2001, the feds were complicit in the attacks on New York City since they knew of plans to hit the World Trade Towers at least a year in advance. Knowing that the towers were designed to take multiple impacts from aircraft and still stand, militarized munitions were employed to implode those two buildings—and the military command center that was World Trade Center building 7 (which was never hit by a plane because that plane was shot down over Pennsylvania) in order to bring us to war against Afghanistan.
We also see false flags in action with our school shootings. Every time a school or mass public shooting takes place, the perpetrator is usually on psychotropic drugs, is found to be affiliated with some form of government mind control program and ends up dead so he can’t talk. Then we get to hear endless diatribe about how we have to ban guns in order to make us all safe. The only people who are safe when guns are banned are those (politicians and criminals) who still have theirs.
I suggest with the track record of the criminals who control our government, this recent North Korean event could end up in the feds blasting a few U.S. cities with nukes, blame it on the North Koreans to distract us from the planned economic implosion we are currently experiencing. They will then force us all to accept Senator Feinstein’s draconian gun restriction legislation to keep us safe from the nukes. Does this sound ridiculous? Probably no more ridiculous than having someone like Barack Hussein-Obama as president of the United States.
Now, as a side-note: Don’t think a Republican Mitt Romney would have made things any different. The power structure that owns the U.S. President and Congress controls Republicans just as effectively as it does Democrats.
©2012 David R. Deschesne, All Rights Reserved