Back to Fort Fairfield Journal WFFJ-TV Contact Us
42% of Women Who Received COVID-19 “vaccine” Reported Changes to their Menstrual Cycle, NIH-Funded Study Finds
By: David Deschesne
Fort Fairfield Journal, November 16, 2022
According to a study1 funded by the National Institute of Health, 42% of women surveyed reported changes to their menstrual cycles, while 66% of postmenopausal women experienced breakthrough bleeding, after receiving one of the experimental COVID-19 ‘vaccines.’ The Pfizer ‘vaccine’ was the most reported among the group, followed by Moderna’s concoction.
The study was conducted among over 35,000 women who were asked how their menstrual cycles had changed after receiving a COVID-19 'vaccine'.
Natalie Winters, lead investigative reporter for National Pulse was interviewed on GBNews in the UK since there is little to no press or media coverage of this problem in the U.S.
“What really, I think, is so eye-catching about this study is not just the [42%] but how this story, really the impacts that COVID-19 'vaccines' have had particularly on young women and their menstrual cycles how the media refuses to report on it.” said Winters.
Extrapolated to the U.S. population, these statistics suggest that over 40 million women have had their menstrual cycles affected by the COVID-19 'vaccines.' “When you're talking about menstrual cycles, you're talking about fertility which is of course on the forefront I would say in terms of concerns in young women's minds. Remember, it was really young women, women my age, college students, who were forced to get COVID-19 'vaccines' to return to school, to be able to really do anything that people in that age group would normally do so it's really, really interesting that these people have been so heavily impacted.”
Ms. Winters also noted another NIH-funded study a few months back found that the COVID-19 'vaccines' were actually lengthening the menstrual cycles of young girls in particular. “While it's kind of easy to get bogged down in the data points reading these studies - there's a lot of data, a lot of numbers - the point is that these COVID-19 'vaccines' are clearly and demonstrably having an impact on the most important thing when it comes to young women's' fertility.”
This is not a new phenomenon. In the May 19, 2021 edition, the Fort Fairfield Journal published an extensive report on how the COVID 'vaccines' are adversely affecting menstrual cycles of women. Dr. Christiane Northrup, an Oby-Gyn from Yarmouth, Maine was quoted in that article stating, “A friend of mine recently sent me a picture of what came out of her body - she's a woman in her thirties - entire decidual casts, they're called, meaning that the entire inside of the uterus just sloughs off,” said “The menstrual cycle is one of the indices of health. So, we know that a regular menstrual cycle every 25 to 30 days is considered one of the ways that we determine a woman's health. When suddenly you have thousands of people all over the world, many of whom have not been vaccinated but have been around those who have [and begin to experience problems], we begin to wonder.”
What Dr. Northrup was hinting at was the concept of spike protein “shedding” from the 'vaccinated' to those around them. This is not conspiracy theory. An April, 2020 document published in the New England Journal of Medicine by Pfizer2, one of the COVID-19 'vaccine' manufacturers, as they began their trials in the Spring of 2020, advises trial participants to inform them if they either become pregnant, or come into contact with a woman who later became pregnant because they were considering the possibility that their experimental mRNA vaccine may cause the test subjects to shed the synthetic particles created by the vaccine recipient and those particles could adversely affect others.
The experimental COVID 'vaccines' also spawned a litany of authoritarian government vaccine mandates which private businesses and academia also adopted as a prerequisite for using their services. Winters suggested there might be more nefarious reasons for these mandates. “At the end of the day the benefits of these, whether it's 'vaccine' mandates, mask mandates, digital ID and digital passports, there actually are no benefits to common people. The only people who benefit from them are the elites who are putting them in place so that's why they have to lie and that's why they have an army of really data fact checkers and establishment media outlets who enforce their narrative.”
Since the alleged ‘vaccines’ seem to be behaving as a biological warfare weapon designed to target the blood in people generally and the reproductive organs of women specifically, it may be that they were purposefully designed to be a population culling drug which would explain the hysterical media build-up of the COVID-19 coronavirus and the subsequent hyperbolic marketing campaign engaged in by not only governments and the media, but also the U.S. drug safety watchdog –the Food and Drug Administration, who also participated in the marketing of the experimental gene therapy drugs to the masses (and continues to today) with no regard to all of the safety signals the drug trials were warning of.
notes:
1. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abm7201
2. https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa2027906/suppl_file/nejmoa2027906_protocol.pdf
.