Back to Fort Fairfield Journal      WFFJ-TV      Contact Us






Inventor of mRNA Vaccine Technology Warns Parents Not to Give COVID ‘vaccines’ to their Children

By:  David Deschesne

Fort Fairfield Journal, December 29, 2021

   Dr. Robert Malone, M.D. is an immunologist and virologist who is credited with inventing the mRNA vaccine technology that was ultimately adapted to the current mRNA COVID-19 “vaccines” (though he was not involved in those recent gene therapy developments).  He  delivered a speech at a live stream event on December 12, sponsored by Unity Project and the Global Covid Summit.1 Dr. Malone and other leading physicians discussed their recent Physicians' Declaration update, why healthy children should not be vaccinated and the associated risks.

   In his video speech2, Dr. Malone noted that children have a very low risk of disease from the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus but a much elevated risk for serious life-altering complications resulting from the gene therapy injections now being aggressively marketed by government and the media to that age group.

   Dr. Malone said, “Before you inject your child - a decision that is irreversible - I wanted to let you know the scientific facts about this genetic vaccine, which is based on the RNA vaccine technology I created.  There are three main issues that parents need to understand before they [m]ake this irrevocable decision:

- The first is that a viral gene will be injected into your [children's] cells. This gene forces your child’s body to make toxic spike proteins. These proteins often cause permanent damage in children’s critical organs, These organs include: Their brain and nervous system;     Their heart and blood vessels, including blood clots; Their reproductive system; and, most importantly,  This vaccine can trigger fundamental changes to their immune system.”

Dr. Malone went on, “The most alarming point about this is that once these damages have occurred, they are irreparable. They cannot be reversed.  You can’t fix the lesions within their brains; You cannot repair heart tissue scarring; You cannot repair a genetically reset immune system, and this vaccine can cause reproductive damage that could affect future generations of your family.”

   “The second thing you need to know is about the fact that this novel technology has not been adequately tested,” said Dr. Malone.  “We need at least five years of testing and research before we can really understand the risks associated with this new technology.  The harms and risks from new medicines often become revealed many years later.  I ask you to ask yourself, as a fellow parent, if you want your child to be part of the most radical experiment in human history.”

   He also points out, “The reason they’re giving you to vaccinate your child is a lie.  Your children represent no danger to their parents or grandparents.  It’s actually the opposite. Their immunity, after getting COVID, is critical to save your family if not the world from this disease.”

   Dr. Malone summarizes, “There is no benefit for your children or your family to be vaccinating your children against the small risks of the virus, given the known health risks of the vaccine that as a parent, you and your children may have to live with for the rest of your lives.  The risk/benefit analysis is not even close with this ‘vaccine’ for children.  As a parent and grandparent, my strong recommendation to you is to resist and fight to protect your children.”

   This past summer, other alarm bells were being sounded about “vaccinating” children with the COVID-19 experimental gene therapies.  An article published in the medical journal, Toxicology Reports entitled, “Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?”3 

   In that report, the authors also noted the extremely low risk children have in contracting serious disease from the virus, then explain the dangers associated with the experimental gene therapies which have not yet been fully vetted, especially since the injections bypass normal immune system routes activated during a respiratory infection by injecting the toxins directly into the blood.  “This toxic combination will have bypassed many defensive safeguards (typically provided by the immune system) through direct injection.  As we have shown, the main reasons why we believe the spike protein could be harmful to children even though they don't seem to get sick from exposure to SARS-CoV-2 are 1) the bypassing of the innate immune system by inoculation; 2) the larger volume of spike protein that enters the bloodstream, and 3) the additional toxic effects of the encapsulating LNP [Lipid Nano-Particle] layer.”

   The report, which was written in July, 2021, cited potential adverse events to children that are now being borne out in the population.  Some of those adverse events are: Cardiovascular disorders (heart inflammation and blood clots); Gastrointestinal disorder; Neural disorders; Immune system disorder; Endocrine disorders (causing heavy menstrual bleeding and menstrual disorders in young girls) and a large number of different vision and breathing problems.

   “All the major systems of the body are impacted, and many of the major organs as well,” stated the report authors.  “Given the lag times in entering data into VAERS [Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System] and the fact that inoculations of children started fairly recently, we would expect the emphasis to be immediate symptomatic and biomarker reactions.  More time is required for organ and system damage to develop and emerge.  Cardiovascular problems dominate, as our model for spike protein/LNP circulation and damage predicts, and it is unknown how reversible such problems are.”

   The authors question the aggressive marketing of these experimental gene therapies to children.   “What is the rush for a group at essentially zero risks?  Given that the inoculations were tested for only a few months, only very short-term adverse effects could be obtained.  It is questionable how well even these short-term effects obtained from clinical trials reflect the short term effects from the initial mass inoculation results reported in VAERS...There appears to be modest benefit from the inoculations to the elderly population most at risk [editor: those who aren't killed by the toxic injections], no benefit to the younger population not at risk, and much potential for harm from the inoculations in both populations.  It is unclear why this mass inoculation for all groups is being done, being allowed, and being promoted.”