Fort Fairfield Journal About Us Contact Us Advertising Rates Subscribe Distribution Bible Reference Our Library
School Board Looks Into Withdrawing from AOS 99
By: David Deschesne
Fort Fairfield Journal, October 5, 2011
FORT FAIRFIELD—The Fort Fairfield school board recently voted to look into ways to withdraw from the recently formed Alternate Organizational Structure (AOS).
When the Maine legislature hatched their ill-conceived plan to consolidate school systems throughout Maine they placed penalties in the form of reduced State subsidies on school systems who chose not to consolidate with other schools.
In order to avoid the penalties, SAD 20 in Fort Fairfield, SAD 42 in Mars Hill and Bridgewater agreed to form an AOS that would merge most of the central office and administrative functions of the schools. Unlike a Regional School Union (RSU), the AOS plan allowed for the continuation of local school boards, local contracting of teachers and retained ownership of the buildings within the respective towns that originally paid to build them.
A recent change in the law now removes penalties from non-consolidated schools. Those who formed RSUs have essentially no way to back out, while AOS systems retain enough local autonomy to dissolve and revert back to their former local status.
of the main reason that AOS 99 was formed was to avoid penalties. In the last
two years the three school systems have saved over $350,000 by avoiding these
said Marc Gendron, Superintendent of SAD 20 in Fort Fairfield.
Spring a new law was passed that removed the penalties for 'non-conforming'
districts. In light of this new development the school boards of 42 and 20
have voted to explore the steps that would be needed to dissolve the AOS.”
At the present time all the school boards are doing is exploring the
possibility of dissolving the AOS.
my opinion, if we return to our previous organizational structures, the
districts will continue to work together to save money. For example sharing
professional development, combining driver education programs, etc.,”
savings on the administrative side, which did exist, have to be considered in
light of the attention and focus required to do the best job for students in
each individual school system. This is what we will be looking at in the
coming months. The elimination of the penalties gives us the opportunity to
look at our relationship in a new way.”